Independently Wealthy
The Internet has created a rich reservations and distribution system for one-of-a-kind hotels, enabling them to challenge the competition.
By Joan Marsan, Technology Editor -- HOTELS Magazine, 7/1/2000
When it comes to reservation systems and distribution
models, large hotel companies traditionally have had some inarguable
advantages. But the Internet boom is making independents equal players
in the game to gather better business. At the April American Hotel & Motel
Association conference in Phoenix, sponsors Pegasus Solutions, the
Cornell University School of Hotel Administration and HOTELS Magazine
gathered independent hoteliers to discuss the changes in the reservations
arena that the Internet has enabled. Their words and ideas, presented
here verbatim, reflect the great gains independents worldwide are
making as they reach, and capture, a broader client base.
Q: How are the new activities on the Internet and the way distribution
channels are changing affecting your properties from the standpoint
of reservations and distribution?
Rob Holeman: Since I don't have an online booking system on the Internet,
90% of my reservations are by phone. I see the Internet is generating
a tremendous amount of phone calls on a daily basis. I got a toll free
phone number [listed just on the Internet] that is running approximately
25% of my call volume. But because it is an 877 number, and a lot of
people do not realize that 877 numbers are toll free, they call me on
my regular line, too. So I would say about 38% of business comes from
the Internet. In the future, I would like to have an online booking
engine. I think that would cut down my call volume.
Randy Wilcott: We are still seeing our reservations coming through
the traditional channels of voice or through the GDS. About 40% to 50%
of our reservations still are coming through voice. We are using the
Internet as an awareness vehicle but spending more money on the technology
side in terms of our computers and our phone systems. We are providing
more efficient systems, so we have less abandoned calls and better conversion
rates. We are also looking at going into e-commerce. We are going to
hook our hotel property software system into the Internet, so they can
look at it and book right there. That is going to be coming in the next
three or four months.
Jules Sieburgh: It seems the Internet is the one channel people are
focusing on. If they look at the real numbers, even with the trends
in booking, it is still a very, very small percentage. It will continue
to grow, especially if you see examples where it is generating lots
of leads or bookings, even though you are not able to do the electronic
booking yet. But that would make it just more efficient.
Q: To what extent does an independent property outsource its Web site?
Mary Mantle: We just launched the Olympus Hospitality Group and Rock
Resorts Web sites. We worked with a local vendor, and the senior partners
are former hotel people. They also have marketing expertise and understand
how people use the Internet. From a design point, something might look
great, but it is not user-friendly or it is time consuming. I want to
make the easiest site for the consumers to use. We do not have an expert
in the Internet or technology on staff, and I look at this as a partnership
that works with us.
Holeman: We used a local vendor the first time, and we saw a plateau.
You do not build a Web site and set it out there. You have to have somebody
marketing it.
Geoff Andrew: We did a survey a couple of months ago of 700 properties
throughout North America. We found about a third of those hotels did
not have their own sites at all. The may be in some other third party
site, but they did not have their own URL. About a third had a URL,
but it was purely e-mail bookings. And then a third had bookability,
but the majority of those were not in an exclusive booking environment.
Most of the hotels with booking engines were linking into Travelweb.com
or WorldRes or somewhere else where the ability for the client to escape
them was right there.
Q: As your Internet sites grow and develop, are you going to have direct,
live, real-time inventory? Is that going to be automatically adjusted
by your property management system (PMS)?
Wilcott: It is going to be coordinated through the GDS and/or PMS.
Sieburgh: So you are not really direct, yet.
Andrew: That is one of the biggest things we are coming up against.
The ability to control any and all channels through one point, to be
able to have one data entry point that might be your PMS and then works
through the CRS and other distribution channels is definitely attractive.
That is one of the challenges these Internet-only reservation sites
are having. The hotels are not necessarily keeping up with availability.
Mantle: Right, the inventory controls. Properties want to limit the
amount of time spent controlling inventories. If you have only got one
single system to control, your opportunity for mistakes is limited as
well.
Andrew: And as more and more hotels hook revenue management systems
into the mix and decisions are being made and automatically pushed out,
you are going to increasingly want some kind of central automated view
of what your inventory is doing.
Q: Are you still putting investment dollars into the voice side?
Wilcott: No doubt about it.
Mantle: When you look at independent properties, and particularly resort
destination locations, people go to the Internet to find general information
about locations and activities. But when they are ready to book the
reservation, they still call the hotel or go through their travel agent
because they also want to book other activities: golf, tennis, or the
spa. There are a variety of other things they want to find out from
a human voice. The Internet is a critical element for us as we continue
to market our brands and our independent properties, but we are still
seeing people go back to the voice for that final booking.
Wilcott: As independents, too, we are spending a lot of time and manpower
on creating awareness in the consortia side of things, getting to know
agents and building relationships there so that when they think of a
destination in our part of the country, they pick up the phone and book
us. We still want to build relationships.
Andrew: There is quite an interesting differentiation between what
is coming through on the GDS and what is coming through on voice. Typically
what comes through the voice system is a more complex leisure stay.
There is not a level of confidence when it is a more emotional buy for
a vacation or an extended business stay than that two-night corporate
stay. That flows also into international reservations. A high percentage
of the bookings we make in North America on the voice side are for the
rest of the world, not North America. Again, there is that level of
confidence about where you are staying. They are looking for advice
as much as anything else in making that booking. The rest of the bookings
are flowing nicely through electronic systems.
Q: How do you take what is perceived by consumers as an independent
property and bill it against mega-brands with 2,000 properties or 300,000
or more rooms worldwide?
Mantle: We have got to focus energies and efforts into reaching those
people looking for niche experiences. It is not marketing to the masses
of business travelers. It is marketing to the incentive market, the
upscale corporate small meetings market. You focus your resources on
finding those particular niches. And when we look at the vehicles to
do that, the Internet is still very prominent and will be an area where
we continue to spend dollars and efforts.
Andrew: Where we come into play as a collection and as a marketing
group is in the ability to provide an extension of sales and marketing
experts. For a lot of hotels, that is what you are looking for: the
international presence and a domestically broader set of programs with
which to work and share. Then there is that whole concept of shared
costs, to be able to aggregate some of the marketing, operational and
reservation aspects into a larger group, which is exactly what the bigger
chains are going form economies of scale. It is the ability to be able
to be yourself and have an independent identity but operate within a
larger environment with like-minded hotels.
You want to be on the Internet. You want to be successful. It's the
same model that is true in the legacy distribution world. Get yourself
in the right position on the GDS screens, and get yourself into the
right pricing level against your competition on the CRO screens. It
is a little more of an operational discipline there and a pricing discipline
to compensate for the branding side.
Sieburgh: I am a little concerned that we are talking about an era
where branding means everything. I think all of the statistics show
branding is starting to be less and less meaningful. If you look at
Priceline, it is a non-branded committed offer, and we get a lot of
traffic in there. There may be bands of brands, but brand concern is
dropping.
Q: Have you seen an evolution of the groups and meetings market? Do
you handle these reservations differently from transient sales and single
bookings?
Wilcott: Most definitely. As an independent, 65% of our business is
generated by the group meetings market, and 35% is generated by leisure.
The group consumer, the meeting planner, is really the individual that
we target on our Web site.
Q: How has the Internet affected the independent hotel's relationship
with travel agents?
Wilcott: The Internet has affected the travel agent's relationship
with the consumer more than it has with the property. There are consumers
that maybe used the travel agent before Priceline came around. But our
relationship with the travel agent has not been affected dramatically.
Mantle: We still view travel agents as a very important partner to
us. They have the capability of going on the Internet, pulling up information
they may not have on our properties, providing them with more resources
to sell the property and make another sale for themselves, as well.
We are not seeing the travel agents view our Internet sites in a negative
way. It is still a support tool for them.
Andrew: What we are seeing is incremental business. It is that 65%
to 70% of business that would have gone directly to property and is
now moving to the electronic environment. There is going to be an impact
there, but we are not seeing it now in any dramatic form.
GDS growth was bringing the hotel industry more into the electronic
environment in that first phase. With the whole airline commission cap,
there has been a surge toward hotels as a sensible and viable alternative
to replacing that revenue. We see more business from travel agents.
Q: How do fees get portioned out to these third-party providers?
Andrew: When the Internet started to excite people's
imagination in the industry, they felt, "Finally, no more distribution costs." But
the actual model has not changed at all. There is still
a huge desire to control distribution, and there
is still value to be added to the distribution chain.
Sieburgh: Like when computers came out, we thought there would be no
more paper. The model of how you sell a hotel room is shifting. There
may be no travel agent commission, but there are other ways of making
that money and selling that hotel room. You do not have to be specific
with rates because Prceline.com may make a margin on it or may subsidize
it.
Q: To what extent has the Internet leveled the playing field between
independent properties and the major chains?
Mantle: Independent properties have the same ability to hook into the
various search engines and other links out there. As long as we are
searching for those links, making sure we target those niches that our
customers look for, and finding those key words that people are going
to use, we can be just as proficient.
Holeman: We started three years ago with a Web site. We are going to
our third site this year. We are getting some incredible numbers. We
are projecting this month at 60,000 user session, not hits. That is
almost 2,000 a day, and for a 47-unit hotel property. It has definitely
leveled the playing field.
Tech Briefs
More Than Mints
In a survey of 272 hospitality units, Reed Business In-Stat Group found
that 73.9% of respondents are interested in adopting broadband access
for their guests. Of those, 82.3% plan to deploy systems within the
next two years. More than half (56.3%) of those interested anticipate
deploying high-speed Internet access to more than 50% of their rooms.
Three primary impediments to high-speed implementation identified by
hoteliers were cost (42%), lack of necessity (32%) and lack of technical
personnel to administer the system (19%). To recoup costs, the most
prevalent fee schedule emerging is a per-night charge averaging US$10.
Stay Connect
The 52% daily usage rates of in-room PCs (2% of guests connected laptops
to high-speed ports) tested in 800 rooms spurred Choice Hotels International,
Silver Spring, Maryland, to launch Stay Connect, Inc., a hospitality
services company created to provide to the lodging industry high-speed
Internet access for in-room PCs and laptops.
Stay Connect will provide a full hotel telecom solution, outfitting
all rooms with high-speed access and 30% of rooms with PCs. Hotels will
pay US$3 per day for each PC-equipped room, but will pay no up-front
installation costs. Participating hotels create their own models for
charging guests for the service.
"Choice Hotels is looking at this as potentially a huge opportunity," says
David Goldberg, vice president operations, Stay Connect.
Choice plans to offer the service to other hotels and chains, with
a goal of reaching 50,000 rooms by 2001.
Dual Access
The Hotel Phoenix, Singapore, introduced the Intelligent Key Card,
a smart card developed jointly by the Land Transport Authority (LTA)
of Singapore, the Singapore Tourism Board and the hotel. The key card
allows guests access to Singapore's public transportation, as well as
to their rooms. The launch of the cards coincides with the LTA's introduction
of contactless smart cards for public transportation systems.
Intelligent Key Cards have a stored value of $20 for payment of transportation
fares. The guest can claim a refund for any unused amounts from the
hotel's front desk upon check out.
Supplyline
- Bass Hotels & Resorts has created cross-selling
clusters in Houston, Los Angeles and New York City using the Delphi
Multi-Property Edition sales automation application by Newmarket
International, Portsmouth, New Hampshire...
- Raffles International, Singapore, and Regal Knickerbocker
Hotel, Chicago, signed subscription agreements with
IXATA Group, San Diego, for their RFP Express service. Raffles also
purchased a 10% stake in Singapore-based e-commerce provider IBEXCO...
- MICROS
Systems, Columbia, Maryland, allied with Systems
Union, UK, to offer the SunSystems back-office solution with the Micros
hospitality management suite...
- Hotel Kämp,
Helsinki, installed the back-office Integrated Management
Information Solution by Scala Hospitality, Amersterdam...
- Hilton Hotels Corp., Beverly
Hills, California, contracted with eKiosk.com, New
Lenox, Illinois, to deploy high-speed public Internet kiosks in North
American Hilton and Doubletree Hotels...
- The Regal Hotel Group, UK, chose Dallas-based
Pegasus' Utell to provide marketing and reservations
services...
- Inntopia.com, Stowe, Vermont, will be the
first consumer site to use Resort Automation, Inc.
software acquired in the Unexplored Travel Network, San Francisco,
purchase of Resort Automation...
- Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide,
White Plains, New York, chose Ameranth Technology
Systems, San Diego, to design a wireless housekeeping
inspection tracking system... OpenGrid, Santa Clara, California,
and WizCom, Parsippany, New Jersey, launched the OpenGrid solution,
providing hotel bookings from wireless, Internet-enabled devices.


















View All Blogs

