Recent Posts
- Hotel Ad Doesn't Push Envelope, It Flushes It
- The Mystery Of Phone Charges
- Random Act Of Kindness
- Attention To Detail Rocks
- Have A Bad Online Reputation? Manage It
- Hawthorn Takes Chance With Guest Comments
- Chicago Hotels Star In 'Dark Knight'
- I Wish They All Could Be Milwaukee Girls
- VibeAgent Shifts Focus From Web 2.0
- Paying For Wi-Fi 'Makes Me Angry'
Recent Comments
- Salgado on Hotel Ad Doesn't Push Envelope, It Flushes It
- Matt on Random Act Of Kindness
- Jon Inge on The Mystery Of Phone Charges
- Amyn Ali on The Mystery Of Phone Charges
- Barack on Random Act Of Kindness
Most Commented On
- Wi-Fi: Give It Away Now (13)
- Free Wi-Fi Is A Pandora's Box Already Open (11)
- In Defense Of Free Wi-Fi (9)
- Paying For Wi-Fi 'Makes Me Angry' (9)
- Chicago Hotels Star In 'Dark Knight' (3)
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Blog
'Simpsons' Makes Dig At Hotel Names
January 7, 2008
Everyone’s favorite cartoon family, The Simpsons, takes a subtle, light-hearted shot at the hotel industry’s ubiquitous branding in the episode “E Pluribus Wiggum,” which aired Sunday in the United States.
In the episode, which satires the American electoral process, Homer and company attend a focus group presentation held at a hotel with the intentionally long-winded name: “Residence Inn by Hyatt Embassy Suites by Courtyard by Marriot—A Starwood Hotel.” Marriott is indeed misspelled, most likely an error by the animators. The meshing of seven hotel brands from four companies, however, is less a mistake than an example of the charming “Simpsons” quality of just not caring whether it makes any sense.

At Marriott International headquarters in Washington, D.C., the Simpsons gag generated a hearty chuckle. “We think this did a decent job of clearing up the branding confusion that can exist in today’s lodging industry,” says corporate spokesman Jeff Flaherty. “We also understand why there wasn’t enough room on the sign for the second T in Marriott.”
The simple sight gag does indeed resonate with truth on some level with the public, though. With so many brands in the marketplace, the casual traveler really can’t keep them all straight, let alone know which brands are associated with what parent companies. Not to mention, there are a lot of hotels with some ridiculously long and unwieldy names out there— Marriott’s Maui Ocean Club- Lahaina and Napili Villas, A Marriott Vacation Club, anyone?
Posted by Adam Kirby on January 7, 2008 | Comments (0)


