Musings & Miscellany 
Recent Posts
- Let The Debate Begin
- A Clever Use Of Facebook
- Marriott Adds Porno Pop-Ups
- Odds & Ends
- Hotel Ad Doesn't Push Envelope, It Flushes It
- The Mystery Of Phone Charges
- Random Act Of Kindness
- Attention To Detail Rocks
- Have A Bad Online Reputation? Manage It
- Hawthorn Takes Chance With Guest Comments
Recent Comments
- suri,from Bahrain on Marriott Adds Porno Pop-Ups
- Adam Kirby on Random Act Of Kindness
- Rosa R on Random Act Of Kindness
- Jess Wonderin on A Clever Use Of Facebook
- Tom Kenson on Marriott Adds Porno Pop-Ups
Most Commented On
- Wi-Fi: Give It Away Now (13)
- Free Wi-Fi Is A Pandora's Box Already Open (11)
- Paying For Wi-Fi 'Makes Me Angry' (10)
- In Defense Of Free Wi-Fi (9)
- Marriott Adds Porno Pop-Ups (7)
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (0)
Hawthorn Takes Chance With Guest Comments
Upon learning last week that Hawthorn Suites is now posting guest comments and star ratings on its official Web site, my reaction was similar to HotelChatter's: it's an, er, gutsy move.
That's assuming, of course, that the brand doesn't merely cherry-pick the best reviews and conveniently omit reponses that aren't so gleaming. Barbara Wiener-Fischhof, vice president of corporate communications for Hawthorn parent company US Franchise Systems Inc., tells me the intent is to be as straight-forward as possible with the review process.
This review page, for the Hawthorn in Galveston, Texas, is the closest I could find to having real negative postings ... but considering the two reviews average 4.5 stars, and the worst thing said is that the housekeepers need to try a little harder, I'm not exactly sold yet that the Hawthorn Web site will become a clearinghouse for truly candid property reviews. But time will tell.
Only confirmed guests are allowed to submit reviews and ratings, via virtual comment cards e-mailed to guests after their stays.
Obviously, a hotel brand has to be pretty confident in its product to invite customers to critique it. Just as a positive review on a neutral site like TripAdvisor carries more weight with potential guests than a similar review on the brand site, so too would a negative review carry a stronger air of legitimacy if it appeared on the hotel's own homepage.
While the risks to a hotel are evident, the rewards for posting honest reviews are potentially great.
Besides the street cred, for lack of a better term, that the brand gets for being truthful and frank about its relative shortcomings, there is also a Web traffic benefit. That is, if consumers believe they can trust the reviews posted on the brand's own site, they will be less likely to visit a separate review site. Keeping them on the brand site, of course, translates to a greater conversion rate.
I hope more hotel brands follow Hawthorn's lead—but if it's done, it's got to be all the way. Only posting the good reviews actually undermines your product more, making the consumer ask, "What are they hiding, and why?"
Are there any other hotels or brands out there that are doing this? I know there's a few brands embedding TripAdvisor feeds on their sites, but what about do-it-yourself posting like Hawthorn is doing?
Hawthorn Takes Chance With Guest Comments
July 22, 2008
Upon learning last week that Hawthorn Suites is now posting guest comments and star ratings on its official Web site, my reaction was similar to HotelChatter's: it's an, er, gutsy move.That's assuming, of course, that the brand doesn't merely cherry-pick the best reviews and conveniently omit reponses that aren't so gleaming. Barbara Wiener-Fischhof, vice president of corporate communications for Hawthorn parent company US Franchise Systems Inc., tells me the intent is to be as straight-forward as possible with the review process.
This review page, for the Hawthorn in Galveston, Texas, is the closest I could find to having real negative postings ... but considering the two reviews average 4.5 stars, and the worst thing said is that the housekeepers need to try a little harder, I'm not exactly sold yet that the Hawthorn Web site will become a clearinghouse for truly candid property reviews. But time will tell.
Only confirmed guests are allowed to submit reviews and ratings, via virtual comment cards e-mailed to guests after their stays.
Obviously, a hotel brand has to be pretty confident in its product to invite customers to critique it. Just as a positive review on a neutral site like TripAdvisor carries more weight with potential guests than a similar review on the brand site, so too would a negative review carry a stronger air of legitimacy if it appeared on the hotel's own homepage.
While the risks to a hotel are evident, the rewards for posting honest reviews are potentially great.
Besides the street cred, for lack of a better term, that the brand gets for being truthful and frank about its relative shortcomings, there is also a Web traffic benefit. That is, if consumers believe they can trust the reviews posted on the brand's own site, they will be less likely to visit a separate review site. Keeping them on the brand site, of course, translates to a greater conversion rate.
I hope more hotel brands follow Hawthorn's lead—but if it's done, it's got to be all the way. Only posting the good reviews actually undermines your product more, making the consumer ask, "What are they hiding, and why?"
Are there any other hotels or brands out there that are doing this? I know there's a few brands embedding TripAdvisor feeds on their sites, but what about do-it-yourself posting like Hawthorn is doing?
Posted by Adam Kirby on July 22, 2008 | Comments (0)
Industries: Technology
Advertisement
Advertisements
