Recent Posts
- Like Unicorns To Leprechauns
- Sam Zell, Hotel Magnate?
- Grande Dame Bartenders Rated
- The Name Of Hilton's Lifestyle Brand May Be...
- Extended Stay Hotels To Be Divested?
- Hilton's 'Worst-Kept Secret' To Be Unveiled At ALIS
- Morgans Gets Giddily Vulgar
- TripAdvisor Perks: Bribery Or Just Good Marketing?
- Mela Incentivizes TripAdvisor
- Reservations Futures Market: Nice Idea, Not Sure It Works
Recent Comments
- resideo on Twitter To Your Hotel's Advantage
- knowitall but can't do anything with it on Hilton's 'Worst-Kept Secret' To Be Unveiled At ALIS
- Jerry Merkin on Hilton's 'Worst-Kept Secret' To Be Unveiled At ALIS
- Minkrunkressy on Reservations Futures Market: Nice Idea, Not Sure It Works
- HHotelConsult on TripAdvisor Perks: Bribery Or Just Good Marketing?
Most Commented On
- Hilton's 'Worst-Kept Secret' To Be Unveiled At ALIS (22)
- Islamabad Marriott Owner Vows To Reopen This Year (20)
- Wi-Fi: Give It Away Now (15)
- Paying For Wi-Fi 'Makes Me Angry' (12)
- TripAdvisor Perks: Bribery Or Just Good Marketing? (11)
Archives
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (2)
We Call It CRM; Do Guests Call It Creepy?
A story out of the UK this week crystallizes an uneasy question pondered by many tech-savvy hoteliers: How much information is too much?
At hand is a controversy over the use of the Internet to dig up information on guests in advance of their stays, and to keep files about the interests, habits and preferences of those guests so they may be better served upon return trips. Some wonder whether the practice is a violation of the UK's Data Protection Act, which governs the collection of personal data by companies.
In the hotel industry, we call this customer relationship management; judging by the outcry over the Times of London's expose, the public apparently sees it as an invasion of privacy. So while hoteliers generally think of CRM as smart business—and they're right—are we as an industry heading down the wrong path here? Take this quote from Peter Carey, editor of Privacy and Data Protection magazine: "If you asked a hotel-goer whether they were happy with a file being kept, many might say: 'You've got to be kidding, I wouldn't want that.'" Now, maybe a lot of those folks would have less of a problem with it if they understood just what is being done with that information. But Carey's probably not wrong in that many guests would opt out of CRM if they could.
Now, it's not as if hoteliers aren't conscious of the Orwellian implications of advanced hotel technology. We now have guestrooms that log a person's favorite TV channels and ideal temperatures. We have concierge software that remembers a guest's daughter's birthday. We have hotel Web sites that record a guest's click history and predict what kinds of marketing offers they might be interested in. We have encoded keycards that tell hallway signage what conference the guest is attending and, hey, would they like to reserve a tee time after the meeting? With biometrics, we even store guests' iris scans. And then there is the 180 million-person database of Acxiom's ConnectionPoint-X, which makes Google searches look downright quaint.
So, hoteliers, I ask you: Where is the line on guest privacy? Have we crossed it? And even if we haven't, are you confident that your guests would not object if they knew what kind of information is being kept on them?
We Call It CRM; Do Guests Call It Creepy?
July 1, 2008
A story out of the UK this week crystallizes an uneasy question pondered by many tech-savvy hoteliers: How much information is too much?At hand is a controversy over the use of the Internet to dig up information on guests in advance of their stays, and to keep files about the interests, habits and preferences of those guests so they may be better served upon return trips. Some wonder whether the practice is a violation of the UK's Data Protection Act, which governs the collection of personal data by companies.
In the hotel industry, we call this customer relationship management; judging by the outcry over the Times of London's expose, the public apparently sees it as an invasion of privacy. So while hoteliers generally think of CRM as smart business—and they're right—are we as an industry heading down the wrong path here? Take this quote from Peter Carey, editor of Privacy and Data Protection magazine: "If you asked a hotel-goer whether they were happy with a file being kept, many might say: 'You've got to be kidding, I wouldn't want that.'" Now, maybe a lot of those folks would have less of a problem with it if they understood just what is being done with that information. But Carey's probably not wrong in that many guests would opt out of CRM if they could.
Now, it's not as if hoteliers aren't conscious of the Orwellian implications of advanced hotel technology. We now have guestrooms that log a person's favorite TV channels and ideal temperatures. We have concierge software that remembers a guest's daughter's birthday. We have hotel Web sites that record a guest's click history and predict what kinds of marketing offers they might be interested in. We have encoded keycards that tell hallway signage what conference the guest is attending and, hey, would they like to reserve a tee time after the meeting? With biometrics, we even store guests' iris scans. And then there is the 180 million-person database of Acxiom's ConnectionPoint-X, which makes Google searches look downright quaint.
So, hoteliers, I ask you: Where is the line on guest privacy? Have we crossed it? And even if we haven't, are you confident that your guests would not object if they knew what kind of information is being kept on them?
Posted by Adam Kirby on July 1, 2008 | Comments (2)
Industries: Technology
July 2, 2008
In response to: We Call It CRM; Do Guests Call It Creepy?
Sharon Quigley commented:
In response to: We Call It CRM; Do Guests Call It Creepy?
Sharon Quigley commented:
CRM - Relationship being the operative word. Most personal customer data given to hoteliers is voluntary and used to their benefit where room / activity / other preferences are noted and offered where possible to develop relationships and encourage brand loyalty. Afterall, isn't guest recognition what every customer wants?
July 7, 2008
In response to: We Call It CRM; Do Guests Call It Creepy?
Faith Hilton commented:
In response to: We Call It CRM; Do Guests Call It Creepy?
Faith Hilton commented:
I think a customer would not have a problem and not be surprised at a hotel 'knowing' information about him if they were asked previously to fill out..something..and signed..that would let them know the hotel was keeping a file on them...ELSE...I personally would be annoyed if someone had something 'on me' that I didn't know they did. :-)
Advertisement
Advertisements


