Recent Posts
- Orbitz Rocks The Boat
- Demystifying Search
- Focus On Online Branding
- Practical Application For Social Media
- Welcome to eMarketing Muse
Recent Comments
- DRM on Orbitz Rocks The Boat
- Laureate on Orbitz Rocks The Boat
- LAHOTEL on Orbitz Rocks The Boat
- on Orbitz Rocks The Boat
- You are bias on Orbitz Rocks The Boat
Most Commented On
Archives
Blog
Orbitz Rocks The Boat
May 7, 2008
Orbitz has recently launched its Summer Sale promotion and the implications are far reaching. The Orbitz summer sale is similar to those run by their top tier competitors at this time of year, with one exception. Users can enter the promo code SUMMERSALE10 and receive an additional 10% off their room rate. Here’s the kicker: Orbitz is paying the 10% out of their margin.
Before we discuss what this could mean for the industry, I want to make a couple quick points. Online Travel Agents (OTA) gained significant strength during the previous economic downturn. Hoteliers were desperate for revenue, and these channels offered a new and powerful way to reach consumers. Hotels signed up in droves, and global travel brands like Orbitz came of age. As the economy recovered, some hoteliers expressed frustration with the margins they paid to OTA sites for their listings. Independent and branded hotels began offering discounts on their own Web sites, or shutting down their inventory allotments when they didn’t need the rooms. At risk of losing their position in the marketplace, OTA sites responded with the following:
• Guaranteed allotments or last room availability were included in contracts, ensuring their customers could find rooms, even during high-demand periods.
• Price parity was included in OTA contracts, stating that they would have the lowest publicly available rates. Parity can be complicated, as different OTA sites charge different net rate percentages. To accommodate this, most contract language requires that your net rates be in parity, based on your set markup percentage.
• “Low Price Guarantees” were advertised to the traveling public, giving them confidence that the price they saw on a travel site would be the lowest they could find anywhere. Result: The price for a hotel room is generally consistent across all channels. Until now.
By reducing the price by 10%, funded by its own margin, Orbitz has thrown thousands of hotels out of parity with other travel sites. This week, our clients have been receiving calls from OTA sites asking that their pricing be brought back into parity. A senior operations executive for one of our clients says “Contractually, we are in parity. Expedia and other OTAs have a real issue here. Market forces are finally driving margins down, and this can only benefit hotels across the country.”
Personally, I am fascinated to see how these travel sites respond. The Orbitz promotion is set to run through July 6 for travel through September. More than two months of exposure is probably enough for consumers to begin flocking to Orbitz for the best price. How will their competitors respond? Will they drop their margins to match? Will they strong-arm hotels, telling them they will drop them from the site if they don’t pull away from Orbitz? How will hotels respond?
The last time the economy slowed, major travel sites solidified their business model and grew exponentially. This time, will they act in a different manner? Can hotels and resorts re-introduce free market forces to the margins they pay OTA sites? When it is time to negotiate your 2009 contracts, it may serve you well to remember this story. Remind your representative that Orbitz, and possibly others, were willing to sacrifice a healthy portion of their margin to gain market share and remain relevant.
Posted by Scott van Hartesvelt on May 7, 2008 | Comments (6)
In response to: Orbitz Rocks The Boat
thehotelguy commented:
I am fascinated by the illusion of parity. Many chains advertise that the rates on their Web sites are the "guaranteed lowest." Most properties quote higher rates to the OTAs to compensate for the high commissions; some as much as 25%.
In response to: Orbitz Rocks The Boat
You are bias commented:
and wrong
In response to: Orbitz Rocks The Boat
commented:
You failed to make note of how many hotels as well as hotel chains pulled their properties out of their sale since Orbitz did not even advise or receive permission to do so. All major brands did since it violated the brands best rate Guarantee! You also failed to make note of the reason why they are trying this. It's very simple, they are grasping for anything to stay afloat. Check their 1st Qtr earning released today: "Orbitz posts bigger 1st-quarter loss on weak bookings. For the period that ended March 31, Orbitz, which went public in July, posted a bigger loss of $15 million, or a loss of 18 cents per share, from a loss of $10 million a year earlier. However, domestic bookings declined 6 percent in the first quarter to $2.4 billion. Marketing expenses rose 5 percent to $85 million in the first quarter. Selling, general and administrative expenses rose 10 percent, as Orbitz hired more people to fill positions for its hotel sourcing team, along with financial and legal openings." If any one thinks this move will make them win, they are mistaken. It will and already has had a negative impact with their hotel suppliers and hotel chains. A company can only lose so much money before they go under.
In response to: Orbitz Rocks The Boat
LAHOTEL commented:
says the representative from Expedia
In response to: Orbitz Rocks The Boat
Laureate commented:
"Grasping for anything to stay afloat" I guess that’s one way to view the decision made by Orbitz. Another might be to call this a response to a sagging market. From what I understand, Expedia has been tacking an additional 5% on to required discounts for certain merchandising opportunities and stating that this required fee is credited to Expedia's "Marketing Fund". Depending on your vantage, this could be seen as "grasping" as well, or possibly predatory. Suddenly hotels are asked to kick in for overhead costs? Orbitz has chosen to weather the storm and increase market share by taking money out of their own pockets, not by inventing participation fees. From a consumer or hotelier’s point of view, this is a win. There are arguments for both sides as always, but I'm curious to see what happens if and when consumers become aware.
In response to: Orbitz Rocks The Boat
DRM commented:
Actually the Orbitz sale doesn't in any way violate BORG agreements with my brand. The coupon is not funded by the hotel, hence it's not my problem. As long as they require the promo code to receive a discount, it complies. I love the move by Orbitz. I'm sick of being told what to do by my Expedia market manager.


