Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Hotels

More Bad Hotel Peephole Press

October 14, 2009

I’m loathe to give attention to tabloid "journalism," but this is pretty relevant—and in some ways, kind of shocking.

"Inside Edition" last week sent attractive sports reporter Lisa Guerrero to Marriott Nashville at Vanderbilt University—the hotel that authorities say assisted the stalker of ESPN reporter Erin Andrews in identifying her room—to see if the hotel had tightened up its guest privacy policies. 

A male producer requested a room next to Guerrero’s, and while her exact room was not disclosed, the hotel did confirm to the man that she was staying one floor away from his. Perhaps more significantly, the hotel never informed Guerrero that someone was asking about her. 

The hotel declined to comment, other than to issue a generic statement.

The tabloid TV show then tried a similar experiment at nearby Sheraton Music City. Once again, the hotel neglected to inform Guerrero that another guest requested a room next to hers. When the producer later checked in and tried to confirm that his room was next door to Guerrero’s, this was the exchange:

"Does she know you?"

"Does she know me? Yeah."

"Because, you know, after everything that went on…" This was apparently a reference to the Andrews situation. Nevertheless, the front desk agent granted the request.

A manager at the Sheraton tells the show that such room requests are handled on a case-by-case basis, but in this case: "I would have called."

Personally, I’m dumbfounded that some hotels still have lax policies when it comes to divulging guest information. Hoteliers, for goodness sake: Be overprotective of guest info. Make that extra phone call to confirm that the person requesting guest info actually knows the guest. At the very least, inform the guest when someone else makes an inquiry about him or her. Sure, in the vast majority of these cases, the requests are harmless and on the up-and-up.

But as the Erin Andrews incident has proven, it only takes one malicious inquiry to throw the traveling public into hysteria. And with the economy as it is, the last thing hotels should be doing is giving travelers another reason to stay home.

Oh yeah: It’s also the right thing to do.

Posted by Adam Kirby on October 14, 2009 | Comments (3)

October 28, 2009
In response to: More Bad Hotel Peephole Press
Ryan Brogdon/911securitycameras commented:

Security Cameras in a Hotel is a must. Being liable for something that was recorded but not reported is false. You are only required to pull recorded info if their is an event, theft, complaint or good reason. Security is complex, but handled by the right people that will take the time to use the system to its full capability will be succesfull with it. Nothing else in the world can tell a story like security cameras can. Security cameras not only protect and tell all. They can save a hotel tens of thousands of dollars monthly by better employee management, debunking slip and fall claims, theft reports like stolen bagadge, vanalism........the list goes on and on. Sorry to make this a small commercial but understanding what a camera system is really used for is the power behing managing and protecting your business!


October 20, 2009
In response to: More Bad Hotel Peephole Press
hhotelconsult commented:

I don't think it's "hotels", I think it is lazy employees and bad FOM's that don't know how to train people properly. Almost every time I stay at a hotel, I hear an innocent, mindless utterance of someone's room number and name at the front desk. It happens all the time, and I suggest you try it next time you go to a hotel. It's insane. Frankly, this goes back to the bombing problems too.... much of hotel security is an illusion, and nothing more than something to make people "feel" like there is safety and authority in control. How many pools are broken into after hours? How many people wander around back of house? Security in hotels is a loose concept at the best of them. Not to say there aren't PHENOMENAL teams out there... but it's just so complex. Heck you can get sued for having CCTV, because if it simply records the event, and no one takes action... you can be held accountable for not acting on what is recorded. It is actually why we have not put cameras in some recent properties... it causes liability issues. Security is complex... finding the balance of respecting guests while vigorously respecting their privacy is a fine line.


October 16, 2009
In response to: More Bad Hotel Peephole Press
RobertKCole commented:

I believe your last sentence is the the most important issue. There are no expenditures that are more necessary than training and technology that ensure the guest’s personal security. This is not an area that becomes marginalized during an economic downturn. I recommended how the hotel industry should respond to the Erin Andrews peephole incident in a blog post last week - www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/ A friend told me she how someone had stalking her in a New York City hotel last week. An experienced traveler and seasoned executive, she was unnerved when the guy knocked on her door. The hotel moved her to a different room, but the situation should have never arisen. There is considerable marketing focus on customer engagement, building brand preference and extending relationships in the hospitality industry. The first step to gaining long term trust and commitment is to protect the guest's personal security.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement

HIO Virtual Investment Forum

Advertisement

Resource Center

Newsletters
HOTELS' Daily News Service
HOTELS' eMarketplace
Newsfeed
Recipes & Ideas
eBurger, eBurger
Beverage Briefing
Regional Cuisines
Noncom Niche
In Balance
R&I and Chain Leader eMarketplace
Chain Leader Executive Briefing
Quick Service Reporter
Flashnews
Service Insights
The Specifier
When to Replace
FE&S eMarketplace



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   Useful Sites   |   RSS   |   Help
© 2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy